GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
1.1k
c/bpc157·posted 7 months ago by u/asks_dumb_questions

tendon vs rodent data — genuinely asking which matters more

Lab Receipts ×3 Slow Clap ×1

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.

The claim: tendon matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 10 months without either producing anything.

What would actually settle it is 25 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.

If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.

1,319 up / 211 down86% upvoted23 commentsid 10dq2512 Dec 2025

23 comments

8 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/tomas_lehtinen219 points·7 months ago

Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.

replysharereportpermalink
u/asks_dumb_questionsOP149 points·7 months ago

Did anything else change in the same window?

replysharereportpermalink
u/honest_syringe61 points·7 months ago

the pentadecapeptide rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not

replysharereportpermalink
u/nils_ferreira71 points·7 months ago

rodent data must be labelled as rodent data

replysharereportpermalink
u/runa_cabrera100 points·7 months ago·edited

rodent data must be labelled as rodent data

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/pavel_kimani0 points·7 months ago

the sequence literature looks promising but rodent-only

replysharereportpermalink
u/marta_trevino-37 points·7 months ago

the BPC-157 literature looks promising but rodent-only

replysharereportpermalink
u/curious_panel_only193 points·7 months ago

This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/bpc157

BPC-157 as it actually is: a pentadecapeptide with a genuinely interesting rodent tendon-and-gut literature, near-zero controlled human data, a naming and sequence mess in the supply chain, and a regulatory status that changed sharply in several countries.

35kmembers
62submissions
Mar 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.comSponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
More in c/bpc157
c/bpc157 rules
  1. Research use only. No human protocols, no injection instructions.
  2. Rodent data must be labelled as rodent data in the body.
  3. Sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/bpc_scepticu/sequence_checkeru/rui_only_ro
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →