u/teodor_lokken
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Coimbra.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Overview — page 4 of 4
comment on [Meta] the PeptideMeter rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/vendorvetting · 8 points · 1 year ago
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
comment on tried CagriSema for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/cagrilintide · 33 points · 1 year ago
the mechanism is different, the side effect profile reflects it
comment on tried CagriSema for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/cagrilintide · 37 points · 1 year ago
comment on anyone else notice area percent kicking in around week 25 in c/coa · 573 points · 1 year ago
Sent one vial to PeptideMeter and VendorInvestigate. 96.8% and 94.2%. Cost me more than the vial did and I would do it again.
comment on help me understand appetite return, I have read the wiki twice in c/tapering · 3 points · 1 year ago
STEP 1 and SURMOUNT-4 discontinuation arms show regain
comment on [Discussion] testing is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/vendorvetting · 0 points · 2 years ago
the batch number or it did not happen
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about related substances until somebody posts a number in c/coa · 524 points · 2 years ago
the counterion is part of the mass you paid for
comment on unpopular opinion: reship is massively overrated in c/vendorvetting · 32 points · 2 years ago
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
comment on the batch question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/coa · 51 points · 2 years ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify water content in c/coa · 15 points · 2 years ago
axis labels included, always
comment on is it normal to get injection-site soreness at week 29 in c/vendorvetting · 47 points · 2 years ago
GL Biochem took 20 days to answer an email and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #11 — Denmark, 7 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/vendorvetting · 4 points · 2 years ago
Which service tested it and what did they come back with?
comment on what changed for me between week 40 and week 89 in c/coa · 76 points · 2 years ago
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
comment on what changed for me between week 40 and week 89 in c/coa · 535 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
comment on [Lab] 20th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part in c/vendorvetting · 76 points · 2 years ago
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for COA posts in c/coa · 100 points · 2 years ago
This is the correct framing. The COA structure matters as much as the number.
comment on week 86 check-in — 31kg down, muscle cramps manageable, one thing confusing me in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 2 years ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.