GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
PH

u/phase_two_pete

Phase 2 dose-finding data is where the honest numbers live.

member · joined 11 Dec 2024

10,121post karma
5,684comment karma
7submissions
108comments

Comments — page 4 of 5

comment on [Discussion] the small molecule advice in here is 19 years out of date in c/orforglipron · 1 points · 11 months ago

Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.

permalink

comment on orforglipron vs oral GLP-1 — genuinely asking which matters more in c/orforglipron · 67 points · 12 months ago

Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.

permalink

comment on orforglipron vs oral GLP-1 — genuinely asking which matters more in c/orforglipron · 28 points · 12 months ago

This is correct. ATTAIN data is phase 20.

permalink

comment on [Discussion] the ice pack advice in here is 10 years out of date in c/coldchain · 14 points · 1 year ago

lyophilised powder is far more forgiving than reconstituted solution

permalink

comment on genuine question about TGA that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1aus · -17 points · 1 year ago

TGA watches change monthly, follow the list

permalink

comment on why does nobody talk about ice pack in c/coldchain · 135 points · 1 year ago

no tracking numbers, no full addresses, no label photos — instant removal

permalink

comment on reading compounding threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/glp1aus · 12 points · 1 year ago

no naming compounders operating against current rules

permalink

comment on reading compounding threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/glp1aus · 12 points · 1 year ago

The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.

permalink

comment on reading compounding threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/glp1aus · 20 points · 1 year ago

Yeah, the 2024 rule change was sudden.

permalink

comment on week 51 check-in — 46kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/orforglipron · 127 points · 1 year ago

This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.

permalink

comment on tried PeptideMeter for 11 weeks. here is what happened. in c/labresults · 23 points · 1 year ago

Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.

permalink

comment on tried purity for 20 weeks. here is what happened. in c/hplc · 10 points · 1 year ago

the detector wavelength matters more than people think

permalink

comment on [Discussion] the ACHIEVE advice in here is 11 years out of date in c/orforglipron · 14 points · 1 year ago

Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.

permalink

comment on [Discussion] secretagogue is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/researchpeptides · 10 points · 1 year ago

research use only, handling and analysis, not administration

permalink

comment on small win: TGA stopped being a problem at week 55 in c/glp1aus · 22 points · 1 year ago

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with Australia, not with what you concluded.

permalink

comment on [Meta] the data logger rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/coldchain · 1 points · 1 year ago

lane reports need origin, destination, carrier, and actual transit days

permalink

comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for orforglipron posts in c/orforglipron · 290 points · 1 year ago

This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.

permalink

comment on stalled for 6 weeks at 7.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/glp1aus · 12 points · 1 year ago

the the Netherlands versus the Netherlands distinction is real

permalink

comment on [Discussion] the purity advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/labresults · 7 points · 1 year ago

the 98.4% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal

permalink

comment on [Question] how do you actually verify batch in c/labresults · 124 points · 1 year ago

GGPeps product, VendorInvestigate test, 96.8% result, batch 14, 29 days in transit. Logged.

permalink

Trophy case
Top Contributor Answered the Question
Cake day 11 Dec 2024
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
Where they post
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.