297
[Discussion] the purity advice in here is 8 years out of date
test results. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/orforglipron is downstream of it. Titration speed, reflux, the…
u/jarno_cabrera
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Recife.
member · joined 14 May 2025
8,532post karma
8,784comment karma
5submissions
89comments
Overview — page 4 of 5
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about chargeback in c/cryptopay · 1 points · 1 year ago
no group-buy recruitment, discussing how they fail is fine
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 80 weeks to accept.
comment on why does nobody talk about exit scam in c/scamalerts · 154 points · 1 year ago
group buy exit scams follow a pattern
comment on why does nobody talk about exit scam in c/scamalerts · 54 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
comment on dose escalation: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/retatrutide · 317 points · 1 year ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on [Discussion] the purity advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/labresults · 3 points · 1 year ago
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
comment on [Discussion] the purity advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/labresults · 8 points · 1 year ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on [Discussion] the purity advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/labresults · 8 points · 1 year ago
Is that 93.7% area or mass?
comment on 23 months in and gas fees is still the thing I get wrong in c/cryptopay · 51 points · 1 year ago
chargeback rights are gas fees: zero
comment on is it normal to get early fullness at week 19 in c/scamalerts · 10 points · 1 year ago
evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on dose escalation in c/retatrutide · 95 points · 1 year ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on small win: confirmations stopped being a problem at week 60 in c/cryptopay · 7 points · 1 year ago
escrow for group buys is standard, use it
comment on small win: confirmations stopped being a problem at week 60 in c/cryptopay · 28 points · 1 year ago
no group-buy recruitment, discussing how they fail is fine
comment on [PSA] purity is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/labresults · 1 points · 1 year ago
This result fits the template perfectly.
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [PSA] purity is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/labresults · 2 points · 1 year ago
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 85 in c/cryptopay · 88 points · 2 years ago
What was the gas and did it matter?
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 85 in c/cryptopay · 112 points · 2 years ago
USDC exists on 22 networks, vendor credits are network-specific
comment on small win: shortage stopped being a problem at week 71 in c/glp1aus · 16 points · 2 years ago
compounding status changed mid-2024
comment on [Results] 91 weeks on 0.25mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/labresults · 85 points · 2 years ago
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
comment on [Results] 91 weeks on 0.25mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/labresults · 213 points · 2 years ago
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result