u/jarno_cabrera
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Recife.
member · joined 14 May 2025
comment on [Explainer] confirmations, memos, and the three ways to lose money by typo in c/cryptopay · 69 points · 3 days ago
never post a wallet address, not yours, not a vendor's
comment on [Janoshik] WWB sema 10mg — 98.6%, batch and method inside in c/labresults · 4 points · 8 days ago
inter-lab variance is real, 10 points is inside normal
comment on [TGA] shortage notice archive, worth bookmarking in c/glp1aus · 2 points · 9 days ago
Yeah, the 2024 rule change was sudden.
comment on tried compounding for 7 weeks. here is what happened. in c/glp1aus · 19 points · 11 days ago
The early fullness was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
comment on four accounts, same typo, same hour, all recommending the same shop in c/scamalerts · 8 points · 14 days ago
group buy exit scams follow a pattern
comment on [Pattern] the fake-testing-service scam is getting better and that worries me in c/scamalerts · 17 points · 22 days ago
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
comment on why does nobody talk about TRIUMPH in c/retatrutide · 6 points · 27 days ago
triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual
comment on the phase 2 question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/retatrutide · 52 points · 29 days ago
research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols
comment on [PSA] a discount code in a first comment is an instant ban and here is why in c/scamalerts · 14 points · 1 months ago
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
comment on [Medutest] SWB sema — 98.2%, cold chain intact, 9 days transit in c/labresults · 55 points · 1 months ago
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
comment on why does nobody talk about confirmations in c/cryptopay · 2 points · 1 months ago
Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring phase 2 at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/retatrutide · 2 points · 1 months ago
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring phase 2 at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/retatrutide · 6 points · 1 months ago
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring phase 2 at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/retatrutide · 6 points · 1 months ago
the glucagon component changes the side effect profile, not just the efficacy
comment on help me understand crypto, I have read the wiki twice in c/cryptopay · 24 points · 1 months ago
Which network and did the vendor confirm they credit it?
comment on retatrutide vs TRIUMPH — genuinely asking which matters more in c/retatrutide · 131 points · 1 months ago
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder
comment on [Meta] the confirmations rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/cryptopay · 2 points · 2 months ago
Did you check confirmation speed on that chain?
comment on New Zealand: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/glp1aus · 1 points · 2 months ago
the Poland versus Poland distinction is real
comment on [Results] 22 weeks, 15kg, and chargeback was the hard part in c/cryptopay · 2 points · 2 months ago
confirmations are chargeback, the exchange rate at 21 blocks is the deal
comment on [Meta] the retatrutide rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/retatrutide · 0 points · 2 months ago
Are you quoting phase 2 or is there phase 3 data now?