u/janoshik_junkie
I pay for third-party tests so you do not have to. Results posted regardless of outcome.
long-standing contributor · independent tester · joined 14 Feb 2024
Comments — page 5 of 5
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring reship at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 284 points · 1 year ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on reship — my 22-week log, condensed into one table in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 1 year ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on [Discussion] the Janoshik advice in here is 20 years out of date in c/labresults · 130 points · 1 year ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on what changed for me between week 95 and week 49 in c/labresults · 118 points · 1 year ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 0.5mg and the early fullness got better, not worse in c/labresults · 257 points · 1 year ago
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
comment on [Discussion] the purity advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/labresults · 19 points · 1 year ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on tried denial for 4 weeks. here is what happened. in c/insurancefights · 27 points · 1 year ago
resubmission after denial requires new documentation
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify batch in c/labresults · 459 points · 1 year ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 6 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 282 points · 1 year ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #9 — the Netherlands, 17 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/insurancefights · 403 points · 1 year ago
formulary exclusions are negotiable sometimes
comment on copay: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/insurancefights · 302 points · 1 year ago
external review is the appeal after insurance says no
comment on [Results] 67 weeks, 40kg, and hair loss was the hard part in c/sideeffects · 150 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, the early fullness hit on day 12 for me too, not day 1.
comment on my A1c moved and I cannot work out whether PeptideMeter is why in c/vendorvetting · 31 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, BCH took 21 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.
comment on reship vs Medutest — genuinely asking which matters more in c/vendorvetting · 17 points · 2 years ago
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
comment on [Meta] the below spec rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/labresults · 137 points · 2 years ago
template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result
comment on [Vendor] QST order #19 — Denmark, 21 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/sideeffects · 203 points · 2 years ago
the muscle cramps passes. i promise. not medical advice.
comment on unpopular opinion: reship is massively overrated in c/vendorvetting · 529 points · 2 years ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on small win: step therapy stopped being a problem at week 35 in c/insurancefights · 18 points · 2 years ago
External review overturned the denial. Took 13 weeks but the process exists.
comment on small win: step therapy stopped being a problem at week 35 in c/insurancefights · 20 points · 2 years ago
prior auth criteria are state-specific, denial differs
comment on stalled for 6 weeks at 2.4mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/insurancefights · 0 points · 2 years ago
denial reason codes matter, ask for the actual code