u/cormac_pereira
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Kumasi.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Comments — page 4 of 5
comment on why does nobody talk about related substances in c/coa · 28 points · 1 year ago
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
comment on tried PBS for 8 weeks. here is what happened. in c/glp1aus · 8 points · 1 year ago
What is the PBS status?
comment on tried PBS for 8 weeks. here is what happened. in c/glp1aus · 1 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. AU and NZ differ.
comment on [Results] 96 weeks on 5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/coa · 95 points · 1 year ago
Crossposting this to c/survodutide because the people who need it are not reading this community.
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 6 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 98 points · 1 year ago
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether Zepbound is why in c/tirzepatide · 172 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, dual agonism does produce a different appetite profile than GLP-1 alone.
comment on someone explain tirzepatide to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/tirzepatide · 50 points · 1 year ago
Hard agree. The food noise disappears differently on the two compounds.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #13 — Spain, 39 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/researchpeptides · 165 points · 1 year ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on unpopular opinion: Janoshik is massively overrated in c/vendorvetting · 13 points · 1 year ago
receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule
comment on switched from 12.5mg to 0.5mg and the injection-site soreness got better, not worse in c/coa · 239 points · 1 year ago
the method line is doing real work, not just window dressing
comment on 11 months in and testing is still the thing I get wrong in c/vendorvetting · 649 points · 2 years ago
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
comment on [Discussion] the Australia advice in here is 5 years out of date in c/glp1aus · 164 points · 2 years ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 85 weeks to accept.
comment on [Lab] 8th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/coa · 23 points · 2 years ago
This is the correct framing. The COA structure matters as much as the number.
comment on [Lab] 8th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/coa · 444 points · 2 years ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
comment on small win: testing stopped being a problem at week 65 in c/vendorvetting · 246 points · 2 years ago
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
comment on tried purity for 3 weeks. here is what happened. in c/coa · 1 points · 2 years ago
Slight fix: the number was 99.1, not 96.8. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about area percent until somebody posts a number in c/coa · 176 points · 2 years ago
comment on [Discussion] the related substances advice in here is 15 years out of date in c/coa · 622 points · 2 years ago
Water content was 3.8%, acetate was 6.2%, purity was 99%, but net peptide was only 90% of the label weight. Perfectly honest, just chemistry.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring Zepbound at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/tirzepatide · 18 points · 2 years ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on [Results] 57 weeks, 20kg, and tirzepatide was the hard part in c/tirzepatide · 188 points · 2 years ago
Hard agree. The food noise disappears differently on the two compounds.