1.3k
[Discussion] the appeal advice in here is 3 years out of date
formulary. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/meta is downstream of it. Titration speed, muscle cramps, the endless…
u/amira_dumitru
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Izmir.
member · joined 14 May 2025
2,241post karma
2,508comment karma
3submissions
58comments
Overview — page 3 of 4
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about area percent in c/coa · 69 points · 1 year ago
axis labels included, always
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about reimbursement in c/glp1eu · 70 points · 1 year ago
Not to be pedantic but pharmacy and prescription are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on am I the only one who found formulary harder than the injections in c/insurancefights · 5 points · 1 year ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Adding to this: denial is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on denial: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/insurancefights · 63 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, the denial code matters, it tells you what to fight.
comment on step therapy is the most under-discussed thing in c/labresults in c/insurancefights · 7 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, the denial code matters, it tells you what to fight.
comment on why does nobody talk about related substances in c/coa · 20 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
comment on [Discussion] the appeal advice in here is 3 years out of date in c/insurancefights · 31 points · 1 year ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on [Discussion] the appeal advice in here is 3 years out of date in c/insurancefights · -15 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, the denial code matters, it tells you what to fight.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #9 — the Netherlands, 17 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/insurancefights · 14 points · 1 year ago
formulary exclusions are negotiable sometimes
comment on formulary vs step therapy — genuinely asking which matters more in c/insurancefights · 1 points · 1 year ago
formulary exclusions are negotiable sometimes
Adding to this: formulary is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Results] 72 weeks, 21kg, and EU was the hard part in c/glp1eu · 1 points · 1 year ago
EMA notices are different from national ones
comment on [Results] 72 weeks, 21kg, and EU was the hard part in c/glp1eu · 5 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, EU rules is usually national rules.
comment on [Results] 72 weeks, 21kg, and EU was the hard part in c/glp1eu · 12 points · 1 year ago
reimbursement reality differs sharply
480
[Results] 72 weeks, 21kg, and EU was the hard part
I have had 15 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe. Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied…
comment on three years of area percent threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coa · 0 points · 2 years ago
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring COA at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 101 points · 2 years ago
the batch number or it did not happen
comment on [Meta] the appeal rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/insurancefights · 1 points · 2 years ago
formulary exclusions are negotiable sometimes
comment on the batch question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/coa · 108 points · 2 years ago
axis labels included, always
comment on week 41 check-in — 32kg down, nausea manageable, one thing confusing me in c/insurancefights · 36 points · 2 years ago
Which plan type? formulary is different.