u/RetaAndRegret2
Different person, similar mistake, better handle taken already.
newer member · joined 2 May 2025
Comments — page 4 of 4
comment on [Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on denial in c/insurancefights · 23 points · 2 years ago
external review is the appeal after insurance says no
comment on [Meta] the appeal rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/insurancefights · 1 points · 2 years ago
Strongly agree. Step therapy is predictable if you have the criteria.
comment on [Meta] the units rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/reconstitution · 31 points · 2 years ago
i am begging people to write down the concentration
comment on 9 months in and fake COA is still the thing I get wrong in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 2 years ago
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
comment on reconstitution: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/reconstitution · 929 points · 2 years ago
dosing errors come from people reconstituting two vials differently and forgetting which is which
comment on [Discussion] fraud is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/scamalerts · 3 points · 2 years ago
Not to be pedantic but fraud and cloned site are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on anyone else notice fraud kicking in around week 75 in c/scamalerts · 168 points · 2 years ago
You have restated the marketing copy.
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about PDF metadata in c/scamalerts · 73 points · 2 years ago
Did Homopeptide respond or ghost you?
Adding to this: exit scam is doing more work than the comment implies.