GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Results] 87 weeks, 36kg, and interval stretching was the hard part — 9 comments in the full submission. View in context.
0
c/tapering·submitted 1 year ago by u/ismael_varga

[Results] 87 weeks, 36kg, and interval stretching was the hard part

Resultsbranch of 7 comments

Week 72 update. 28kg down from the start, early fullness basically gone since about week 29. Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with early fullness. The part that surprised me is how much of this is…

Read the full submission and all 9 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 1 year ago
u/zeynep_weiss3 points·1 year ago

interval stretching versus dose reduction

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_vargaOP4 points·1 year ago

interval stretching versus dose reduction

Disagree on that part. 97.6% and 97.9% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/source_or_silence1 point·1 year ago

say how long you were on and at what dose before taper

replysharereportpermalink
u/taper_off_tabithaMOD2 points·1 year ago

This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/chidi_roos1 point·1 year ago

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with regain, not with what you concluded.

replysharereportpermalink
u/chidi_roos1 point·1 year ago

cite the discontinuation data rather than guessing regain rates

replysharereportpermalink
u/diego_szabo1 point·1 year ago

tapering instructions are not welcome here

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/tapering

Stopping on purpose: dose reduction versus interval stretching, what the discontinuation arms of STEP 1 and SURMOUNT-4 actually showed about regain, appetite return timelines, and the people who came off, regained, and went back on without treating it as a failure.

20kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.comSponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

glbiochem.net
More in c/tapering
c/tapering rules
  1. Cite the discontinuation data rather than guessing at regain rates.
  2. No shaming people who restart.
  3. Say how long you were on and at what dose before you tapered.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/taper_off_tabithau/maintenance_mode_maxu/skip_week_sceptic
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →