GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Vendor] QST order #8 — Canada, 9 days, no drama, receipts inside — 39 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.9k
c/survodutide·submitted 10 months ago by u/thermal_mass_tom

[Vendor] QST order #8 — Canada, 9 days, no drama, receipts inside

Discussionbranch of 5 comments

Confession thread, sort of. I went from 0.5mg to 12.5mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 24 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway. So now I have…

Read the full submission and all 39 comments →

This branch

5 comments, started 10 months ago
u/injection_site_iris248 points·10 months ago

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]111 points·10 months ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/refund_ledger26 points·10 months ago

rodent dual agonist is investigation only

replysharereportpermalink
u/renzo_yildiz12 points·10 months ago

Slight fix: the number was 94.2, not 95.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/survodutide

Survodutide-specific discussion: glucagon-receptor co-agonism, the hepatic fat and MASH resolution data, and how the side-effect profile compares with GIP-based dual agonism. Small community, high signal.

12kmembers
62submissions
Feb 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/survodutide rules
  1. Glucagon co-agonism has a distinct safety story. Do not generalise from tirzepatide.
  2. MASH claims need the trial and the biopsy endpoint.
  3. Not approved. Descriptive posts only.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.