[Discussion] we are measuring MASH at the wrong time and calling it noise
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: MASH matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 22 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 5 people measuring the same thing…
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
Which trial arm?
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.