GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of reading exit scam threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly — 27 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.1k
c/scamalerts·submitted 4 months ago by u/adaeze_brandt

reading exit scam threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly

Patternbranch of 7 comments

Quick one. Canada here. fake COA works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US. Specifics: the route I used took 9 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the…

Read the full submission and all 27 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 4 months ago
u/protein_first_pnutrition342 points·4 months ago

Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.

replysharereportpermalink
u/aksel_jansen143 points·4 months ago

Batch 19 appeared on SGN, QST, and SGN claims it is raw material origin. Could be fine, could be reseller. Logged it in the directory.

replysharereportpermalink
u/adaeze_brandtOP251 points·4 months ago

the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag

replysharereportpermalink
u/zaid_eriksen159 points·4 months ago

fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance

replysharereportpermalink
u/careful_gradient_notes63 points·4 months ago

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (2) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/scamalerts
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/scam_taxonomyu/coa_forgery_watchu/whois_wandau/sock_puppet_spotter
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →