GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
1.1k
c/scamalerts·posted 2 months ago by u/gastric_emptying_g

[Question] Sweden — has anyone got a straight answer on fake COA

Question Well Actually ×9 The Quiet One ×1

Genuinely asking, not being difficult.

Everyone in c/reconstitution repeats that exit scam is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 23 threads of people agreeing with each other.

Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it has been repeated since 2023?

I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.

1,347 up / 201 down87% upvoted35 commentsid s2r14a10 May 2026

35 comments

6 in this archive, depth 3

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/tuva_aalto58 points·2 months ago

Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.

replysharereportpermalink
u/laila_yilmaz14 points·2 months ago

Slight fix: the number was 97.6, not 99.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

replysharereportpermalink
u/aleksi_marchand53 points·2 months ago

Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tomas_lundgren36 points·2 months ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]27 points·2 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/nikhil_teixeira68 points·2 months ago

evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/scamalerts
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/scam_taxonomyu/coa_forgery_watchu/whois_wandau/sock_puppet_spotter
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →