[Lab] SGN tirz — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6%
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 0.25mg, week 74, injection-site soreness present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — PDF metadata — and tracked it for 20 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions
the CPC situation resolved, logged it here as resolved
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
the FGP situation resolved, logged it here as resolved
sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions
- 1search before post, but also, welcome6 comments in this branch · started by u/swirl_dont_shake
- 2This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please…4 comments in this branch · started by u/ledger_mod