GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
-90
c/scamalerts·posted 1 months ago by u/ines_ekstrom

the fake COA thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down

Unverified

I have had 23 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.

Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 36 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.

The independent number came back 96.8% against a claimed 97.2%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.

Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.

241 up / 331 down42% upvoted10 commentsid r8p2je6 Jun 2026

10 comments

10 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/gastric_emptying_g21 points·1 months ago

the BCH situation resolved, logged it here as resolved

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]8 points·1 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/coa_forgery_watchMOD15 points·1 months ago

This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/reflux_report-31 points·1 months ago

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rulebook_rachaelmod · c/meta15 points·1 months ago

Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.

replysharereportpermalink
u/solene_ilunga9 points·1 months ago

sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions

replysharereportpermalink
u/dilara_szabo4 points·1 months ago

sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyc/scamalerts3 points·1 months ago

evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test

replysharereportpermalink
u/meera_sandvik2 points·1 months ago

reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations

replysharereportpermalink
u/zaid_eriksen6 points·1 months ago·edited

cloned storefronts use old images, search for those

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/scamalerts
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/scam_taxonomyu/coa_forgery_watchu/whois_wandau/sock_puppet_spotter
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →