GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of genuine question about exit scam that I am slightly embarrassed to ask — 19 comments in the full submission. View in context.
356
c/scamalerts·submitted 2 months ago by u/farid_kuipers

genuine question about exit scam that I am slightly embarrassed to ask

Patternbranch of 8 comments

Quick one. Canada here. scam works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US. Specifics: the route I used took 2 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost.…

Read the full submission and all 19 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 2 months ago
u/dilara_szabo16 points·2 months ago

Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lukas_delgado7 points·2 months ago·edited

fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance

replysharereportpermalink
u/customs_seizure_sid19 points·2 months ago

I am going to push back on this slightly.

replysharereportpermalink
u/scam_taxonomyc/scamalerts15 points·2 months ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]12 points·2 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/careful_gradient4 points·2 months ago

a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so

replysharereportpermalink
u/sena_teixeira4 points·2 months ago

sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions

replysharereportpermalink
u/farid_kuipersOP6 points·2 months ago

evidence required, dated screenshots, metadata, order records, or independent test

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.