GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of cloned site vs fake COA — genuinely asking which matters more — 25 comments in the full submission. View in context.
628
c/scamalerts·submitted 2 months ago by u/ahmed_cardoso

cloned site vs fake COA — genuinely asking which matters more

Unverifiedbranch of 6 comments

exit scam. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/cryptopay is downstream of it. Titration speed, reflux, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort exit scam out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 11 months. My fasting…

Read the full submission and all 25 comments →

This branch

6 comments, started 2 months ago
u/careful_gradient26 points·2 months ago

fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance

replysharereportpermalink
u/swirl_dont_shakereconstitution38 points·2 months ago

fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance

Adding to this: group buy is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/lucia_bruun11 points·2 months ago

sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions

replysharereportpermalink
u/long_post_larry-4 points·2 months ago

Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.

replysharereportpermalink
u/aa_analysis_andy1 point·2 months ago

fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_osei0 points·2 months ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
More in c/scamalerts
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/scam_taxonomyu/coa_forgery_watchu/whois_wandau/sock_puppet_spotter
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →