[Question] PDF metadata — what am I missing here
scam. That is the whole post, but I will justify it.
Everything else people worry about in c/researchpeptides is downstream of it. Titration speed, early fullness, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort scam out first, and almost nobody does.
I say this having got it wrong for 20 months. My eGFR was the thing that eventually made me pay attention, which is a stupid way to learn a lesson that was in the sidebar the whole time.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The MKM exit scam collected 3 orders and disappeared. Order ids 19 through 3 all silent.
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
Adding to this: group buy is doing more work than the comment implies.
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance Adding to this: group buy is doing more work than the comment implies.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
The WXT exit scam collected 9 orders and disappeared. Order ids 24 through 9 all silent.
fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance
- 1The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a…5 comments in this branch · started by u/tuva_aalto