cloned site — 3 things I got wrong before I got it right
Quick one. Canada here.
cloned site works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.
Specifics: the route I used took 16 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.
Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.
best — the order this archive was captured in
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
Can you post the VendorInvestigate result that shows the problem?
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
cloned storefronts use old images, search for those
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
Did KP respond or ghost you?
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
- 1Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be…9 comments in this branch · started by u/ines_ekstrom
- 2Did KP respond or ghost you?4 comments in this branch · started by u/blunt_coldbox_2024