GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
236
c/scamalerts·posted 10 months ago by u/rohan_krastev

cloned site — 3 things I got wrong before I got it right

Pattern

Quick one. Canada here.

cloned site works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.

Specifics: the route I used took 16 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.

Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.

242 up / 6 down97% upvoted24 commentsid nwbv4328 Sep 2025

24 comments

16 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/halima_boateng28 points·10 months ago

The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.

replysharereportpermalink
u/cold_chromatogram3119 points·10 months ago

Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.

replysharereportpermalink
u/careful_gradient9 points·10 months ago

reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations

replysharereportpermalink
u/ines_ekstrom23 points·10 months ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]8 points·10 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/pavel_nkemelu7 points·10 months ago

PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds

replysharereportpermalink
u/ledger_modmod · vetting2 points·10 months ago

PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/reflux_report2 points·10 months ago

no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not

replysharereportpermalink
u/sena_teixeira2 points·10 months ago

Can you post the VendorInvestigate result that shows the problem?

replysharereportpermalink
u/kaplan_meier_kim10 points·10 months ago

This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.

replysharereportpermalink
u/careful_gradient_notes3 points·10 months ago

cloned storefronts use old images, search for those

replysharereportpermalink
u/joaquin_ivaturi5 points·10 months ago

PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox_2024-30 points·10 months ago

Did KP respond or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
u/ledger_modMOD1 point·10 months ago

This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ledger_modmod · vetting1 point·10 months ago

This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.