fraud — my 7-week log, condensed into one table
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking fraud against eGFR for 19 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here. Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no…
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
Can you post the VendorInvestigate result that shows the problem?
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.