[Meta] the PDF metadata rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 1.7mg, week 84, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — group buy — and tracked it for 21 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Dated screenshot or is this from memory?
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
This is evidence. The metadata is checkable and it is odd.
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with group buy, not with what you concluded.
the SSA situation resolved, logged it here as resolved
This is evidence.
Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
reseller scams versus fraud scams are different accusations
- 1n=1 but same5 comments in this branch · started by u/laila_wikstrom