GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
1.6k
c/scamalerts·posted 1 year ago by u/long_post_larry

the scam thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down

Pattern Receipts ×7 Long Haul ×2

Right, the cloned site question again, but with numbers this time.

I have 3 data points over 24 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.

The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 47, not week 96. People give up long before the interesting part.

Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.

2,154 up / 543 down80% upvoted38 commentsid 1n56up31 Aug 2024

38 comments

8 in this archive, depth 3

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/marisol_frisk0 points·1 year ago

fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]1 point·1 year ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/RetaAndRegret21 point·1 year ago

Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ledger_modmod · vetting217 points·1 year ago

fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance

replysharereportpermalink
u/long_post_larry0 points·1 year ago

fake COAs always have the same tell: perfect results, zero variance

Adding to this: exit scam is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/osman_brandt1 point·1 year ago

PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds

replysharereportpermalink
u/farid_kuipers149 points·1 year ago

Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.

replysharereportpermalink
u/coa_forgery_watch-26 points·1 year ago

Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.

replysharereportpermalink
About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.