GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of 24 months in and scam is still the thing I get wrong — 35 comments in the full submission. View in context.
5.9k
c/scamalerts·submitted 1 year ago by u/lucia_bruun

24 months in and scam is still the thing I get wrong

Confirmedbranch of 7 comments

fake COA. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/researchpeptides is downstream of it. Titration speed, early fullness, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort fake COA out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 3 months.…

Read the full submission and all 35 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 1 year ago
u/signe_boateng54 points·1 year ago

Did MKM respond or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
u/coa_forgery_watchMOD39 points·1 year ago

Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ewan_zielinski23 points·1 year ago

Did SSA respond or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_pires18 points·1 year ago

Not to be pedantic but exit scam and cloned site are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

replysharereportpermalink
u/soren_yildiz14 points·1 year ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →
u/aksel_jansen33 points·1 year ago

sock puppet accounts ask the same leading questions

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/scamalerts

Documented fraud: cloned storefronts, recycled COA PDFs, batch numbers appearing across unrelated vendors, fake test reports, group-buy exit scams, and the small number of patterns that account for almost all of it. Accusations without evidence are removed — not because we doubt you, but because unverifiable accusations make the community useless.

58kmembers
95submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/scamalerts rules
  1. Evidence required: dated screenshots, PDF metadata, order records or an independent test. No exceptions.
  2. No doxxing. Company registration details are fine; individuals are not.
  3. If a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so. We keep the record honest in both directions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.