[Discussion] timeframe is doing more work than we give it credit for
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud. The advice on timeframe in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with…
The fatigue was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
This is correct. Process matters more than the number.
starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history
include timeframe and starting point or it is a brag with no info
the community is deliberately image-free