GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of does non-scale victory actually matter or is it forum lore at this point — 38 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.5k
c/progresspics·submitted 5 months ago by u/andres_restrepo

does non-scale victory actually matter or is it forum lore at this point

Resultsbranch of 7 comments

Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: non-scale victory matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 20 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 17 people measuring…

Read the full submission and all 38 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 5 months ago
u/dose_diary_danaMOD323 points·5 months ago

This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hassan_ostergaard269 points·5 months ago

Small correction: the trial was 19 weeks, not 13. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/india_generic_g367 points·5 months ago·edited

text removes the comparison trap

replysharereportpermalink
u/meera_sandvik125 points·5 months ago

text removes the comparison trap

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/andres_restrepoOP186 points·5 months ago

non-scale victories count, post them

replysharereportpermalink
u/receptor_bias_rick147 points·5 months ago

the struggle change matters as much as the scale

replysharereportpermalink
u/halima_mbeki149 points·5 months ago

the milestone change matters as much as the scale

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/progresspics

Progress posts with no images, by design. Starting point, current point, timeframe, dose history, what changed besides the scale. Text-only removes the comparison trap, the body-shaming pile-on and the entire question of who owns a photo of your torso.

51kmembers
62submissions
May 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/progresspics
c/progresspics rules
  1. No images. None. Not even redacted ones. This is the whole point of the community.
  2. Include timeframe and starting point or it reads as a brag with no information.
  3. No commenting on anybody's body. Comment on the process.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/dose_diary_danau/wholesome_lurkeru/gentle_correctionu/still_here_2026
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →