[Question] milestone — what am I missing here
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud. The advice on timeframe in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with…
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
This is correct. Process matters more than the number.
the milestone change matters as much as the scale
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
[deleted]
the milestone milestone is worth posting
This is correct. Process matters more than the number.
Small correction: the trial was 16 weeks, not 30. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
no images, none, not even redacted ones
Came off after 19 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.