GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of disclosure: what the trials say vs what this community says — 40 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.1k
c/meta·submitted 2 years ago by u/maren_sorensen

disclosure: what the trials say vs what this community says

Rulesbranch of 9 comments

Week 3 update. 4kg down from the start, muscle cramps basically gone since about week 55. Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with muscle cramps. The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin.…

Read the full submission and all 40 comments →

This branch

9 comments, started 2 years ago
u/rulebook_rachaelMOD163 points·2 years ago

Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.

replysharereportpermalink
u/maren_sorensenOP87 points·2 years ago

My version of this: I was so worried about the injection that I put it off for eleven days. The injection is the easiest part.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kian_solberg49 points·2 years ago

I am going to push back on this slightly.

replysharereportpermalink
u/nora_lundgren33 points·2 years ago·edited

rules, moderation, ranking, wiki

replysharereportpermalink
u/tuva_iyer27 points·2 years ago·edited

sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly

replysharereportpermalink
u/noor_cardoso8 points·2 years ago

the site talking about itself

replysharereportpermalink
u/stablecoin_steve235 points·2 years ago

Genuine question — what concentration were you at?

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (2) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.