GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of week 21 check-in — 7kg down, reflux manageable, one thing confusing me — 34 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1k
c/meta·submitted 1 year ago by u/prior_auth_pain

week 21 check-in — 7kg down, reflux manageable, one thing confusing me

Appealbranch of 7 comments

Been lurking in c/labresults for about 2 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 34, 1.7mg, and ranking is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 37 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle. What I actually want to know is…

Read the full submission and all 34 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 1 year ago
u/quiet_moderatorMOD146 points·1 year ago

Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]55 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/wanjiru_osei17 points·1 year ago

[removed by moderator]

Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sanne_novak38 points·1 year ago

the moderation decision is logged

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_marchand23 points·1 year ago

Yeah, the evidence standard works.

replysharereportpermalink
u/vito_chowdhury-2 points·1 year ago

the evidence standards are rules

replysharereportpermalink
u/noor_cardoso1 point·1 year ago

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/meta
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/hub_opsu/mod_ambulatoryu/rulebook_rachaelu/quiet_moderator
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →