GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Discussion] we are measuring moderation at the wrong time and calling it noise — 13 comments in the full submission. View in context.
-62
c/meta·submitted 3 months ago by u/halima_boateng

[Discussion] we are measuring moderation at the wrong time and calling it noise

Discussionbranch of 7 comments

Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/maintenancephase repeats that disclosure is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 9 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true…

Read the full submission and all 13 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 3 months ago
u/dose_creep_dan1 point·3 months ago

the evidence standards are disclosure

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_sandvik1 point·3 months ago

Genuine question — what concentration were you at?

replysharereportpermalink
u/kasper_cabrera1 point·3 months ago

the site talking about itself

replysharereportpermalink
u/vito_chowdhury1 point·3 months ago

Strongly agree. Transparency wins.

replysharereportpermalink
u/farid_jansen1 point·3 months ago

This is correct. Modmail first.

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_marchand1 point·3 months ago

the moderation decision is logged

replysharereportpermalink
u/divya_bakken1 point·3 months ago·edited

the moderation decision is logged

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 52 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/meta

Site governance in public: rule changes, moderation decisions and appeals, how the ranking works, wiki maintenance, sponsor disclosure, and the periodic argument about whether c/vendorvetting evidence standards are too strict. They are not.

23kmembers
62submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/meta rules
  1. Moderation appeals go through modmail first; Meta is for policy, not individual cases.
  2. Rule-change proposals need a concrete wording suggestion.
  3. Sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.