switched from 7.5mg to 15mg and the sulphur burps got better, not worse
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking prior authorization against ApoB for 37 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
step therapy documentation is the weapon, use it
redact member ids and group numbers from every screenshot
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
copay is separate from coverage
Strongly agree. Step therapy is predictable if you have the criteria.
prior auth criteria are state-specific, step therapy differs
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Which plan type? step therapy is different.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
do not suggest misrepresenting a diagnosis, that is fraud
appeal letter templates are in the wiki
Strongly agree. Step therapy is predictable if you have the criteria.
formulary exclusions are negotiable sometimes
- 1Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.5 comments in this branch · started by u/kasper_cabrera