help me understand denial, I have read the wiki twice
step therapy. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/meta is downstream of it. Titration speed, reflux, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort step therapy out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 7 months. My fasting…
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
do not suggest misrepresenting a diagnosis, that is fraud
step therapy documentation is the weapon, use it
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
redact member ids and group numbers from every screenshot
step therapy documentation is the weapon, use it
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
external review is the appeal after insurance says no
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
external review is the appeal after insurance says no