[PSA] tier 3 is not what most of this community thinks it is
Right, the NHS question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 21 data points over 8 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 62, not week 16. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Yeah, the NHS waitlist is genuinely two years in most places.
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
the Scottish pathway is different from the English one
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
price posts need the date — UK pricing moves monthly
price posts need the date — UK pricing moves monthly
the tier 3 pathway is the only free route, it is slow
Boots stock check: called 11 locations in France, 38 had 0.5mg in stock. Regional variation is real.
Strongly agree. MHRA is region-specific.
the tier 3 pathway is the only free route, it is slow
England or Scotland? Different pathways.
What is today's date for the pricing?
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
NHS tier 3 is pricing, the waiting list is real
Which Boots location?
Yeah, the NHS waitlist is genuinely two years in most places.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
- 1the Scottish pathway is different from the English one5 comments in this branch · started by u/a1c_arc
- 2the tier 3 pathway is the only free route, it is slow5 comments in this branch · started by u/ferran_mensah