[Results] 67 weeks, 31kg, and pharmacy was the hard part
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: EMA matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 15 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 35 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Crossposting this to c/glp1muscle because the people who need it are not reading this community.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
Stalled for 2 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 64.
the 20-country variation is the whole point
EMA notices are different from national ones
Maintenance for 23 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with EMA, not with what you concluded.
EMA notices are different from national ones
EU rules is usually a national question wearing a hat
[removed by moderator]
EMA and national agency claims need citation
tag your country in the title, bare EU gets a template
Yeah, EU rules is usually national rules.
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Removed a chain here.
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
Stalled for 4 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 86.
- 1Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with EMA, not with what you…6 comments in this branch · started by u/osman_brandt
- 2Yeah, EU rules is usually national rules.4 comments in this branch · started by u/nordic_pricing