[Discussion] can we stop arguing about EU until somebody posts a number
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking EU against eGFR for 37 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
pharmacy stock varies by country and season
pharmacy stock varies by country and season
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
private and public prescription routes differ
the the Netherlands answer is not the the Netherlands answer
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
Yeah, EU rules is usually national rules.
Poland here. Waited 7 months on a list, gave up, went private, and the total cost was roughly what I expected.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
Strongly agree. Pricing is local.
Slight fix: the number was 99.2, not 99.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
- 1Yeah, EU rules is usually national rules.7 comments in this branch · started by u/ignacio_vanhecke
- 2You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.4 comments in this branch · started by u/honest_syringe_maybe