[Discussion] can we stop arguing about private plan until somebody posts a number
I have had 4 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 24 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 96.8% against a claimed 99.1%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
name your province, coverage is provincial
no cross-border purchasing instructions
This is correct. Name your province.
Has anyone actually got this in writing, or is it forum lore at this point?
special authorization is the cross-province difference
the the Netherlands answer is not the the Netherlands answer
private plan details: redact your group number
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
special authorisation is province-specific
special authorisation is province-specific
Adding to this: formulary is doing more work than the comment implies.
name your province, coverage is provincial
- 1no cross-border purchasing instructions8 comments in this branch · started by u/niels_norgaard