u/mod_ambulatory
Volunteer admin. Ex-ambulance, current spreadsheet enjoyer. I read every report queue item.
admin · admin · joined 6 Aug 2023
Overview — page 3 of 4
comment on [Question] Ireland — has anyone got a straight answer on rules in c/meta · 144 points · 10 months ago
Strongly agree. Transparency wins.
comment on [Meta] the purity rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/labresults · 36 points · 10 months ago
Tested 18 batches from KP over 78 weeks. Spread was 98.9% to 98.7, mostly 98.9. Consistent vendor.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about mechanism until somebody posts a number in c/glp1science · 27 points · 10 months ago
Strongly agree. Central appetite is real but people overstate it.
comment on test results: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/labresults · 26 points · 11 months ago
the vial you ordered versus the vial you received might be different batches
comment on test results: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/labresults · 11 points · 11 months ago
Yeah, the VendorInvestigate number matching the claim is the actual signal.
comment on genuine question about appetite that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/glp1science · 31 points · 11 months ago
Rodent, human, or in vitro?
comment on unpopular opinion: wiki is massively overrated in c/meta · 12 points · 12 months ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on my ALT moved and I cannot work out whether failure is why in c/darkspot · 4 points · 1 year ago
tests that came back 95.1%
comment on my triglycerides moved and I cannot work out whether moderation is why in c/meta · 17 points · 1 year ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on batch: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/labresults · 5 points · 1 year ago
the VendorInvestigate and Janoshik results differ by 20 points, both inside inter-lab variance
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify ranking in c/meta · 0 points · 1 year ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on meta — my 21-week log, condensed into one table in c/meta · 3 points · 1 year ago
the wiki is the source
comment on France: meta, and what it actually costs here in c/meta · 64 points · 1 year ago
the ranking formula is meta
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 7 weeks to accept.
comment on France: meta, and what it actually costs here in c/meta · 1 points · 1 year ago
the 7 month rule change is in effect
comment on France: meta, and what it actually costs here in c/meta · 110 points · 1 year ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on what changed for me between week 95 and week 49 in c/labresults · 7 points · 1 year ago
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
comment on [Results] 66 weeks on 5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/glp1science · 252 points · 1 year ago
Crossposting this to c/researchpeptides because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify batch in c/labresults · 513 points · 1 year ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on someone explain moderation to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/meta · 4 points · 1 year ago
the periodic argument about moderation standards
comment on [Results] 76 weeks on 2.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/glp1science · 137 points · 1 year ago
amylin is not GLP-1, posts conflating them get corrected