u/marta_weiss

the 18 A1c trend is the answer

the 59 A1c trend is the answer

Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.

rodent data must be labelled as rodent data

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

type 2 is the indication, weight loss is the side effect

Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.

i am begging people to write down the concentration

research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions

never post a calculation as advice without stating the concentration

Which country?

Adding to this: regain is doing more work than the comment implies.

Yeah, showing the arithmetic is the fastest way for someone to spot the error.

This is correct. 3mL versus 12mL is the common mistake.

never post a calculation as advice without stating the concentration

Australia here. Waited 12 months on a list, gave up, went private, and the total cost was roughly what I expected.

This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.

30mg vial, 2mL water, concentration is 30/2 — write it on the vial afterwards

dosing errors come from people reconstituting two vials differently and forgetting which is which

This is correct. 2mL versus 6mL is the common mistake.

Yeah, showing the arithmetic is the fastest way for someone to spot the error.