5k
[Discussion] we are measuring COA at the wrong time and calling it noise
area percent. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/sideeffects is downstream of it. Titration speed, reflux, the…
u/halima_boateng
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Brno.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
14,051post karma
11,241comment karma
9submissions
96comments
Overview — page 5 of 5
comment on three years of exit scam threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/scamalerts · 704 points · 2 years ago
nobody says this and everybody needs to hear it
comment on the tier 3 question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/glp1uk · 26 points · 2 years ago
no naming online pharmacies that prescribe without a consultation
comment on three years of exit scam threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/scamalerts · 577 points · 2 years ago
Not to be pedantic but exit scam and fake COA are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on batch — my 10-week log, condensed into one table in c/coa · 66 points · 2 years ago
Sent one vial to PeptideMeter and VendorInvestigate.
Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on [PSA] Mounjaro is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/tirzepatide · 288 points · 2 years ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring COA at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 76 points · 2 years ago
Are you looking at area% or net peptide content? Different numbers.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring COA at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 293 points · 2 years ago
the method line is doing real work, not just window dressing
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring COA at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 22 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
comment on [Discussion] can we stop arguing about related substances until somebody posts a number in c/coa · 785 points · 2 years ago
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details
comment on stalled for 21 weeks at 7.5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/scamalerts · -18 points · 2 years ago
the batch number appearing across three vendors is a red flag
comment on [Lab] split one vial across VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter — 98.0% and 97.9% in c/coa · 164 points · 2 years ago
purity and net content are two different numbers, same vial
comment on fraud — 23 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/scamalerts · 45 points · 2 years ago
the reship offer that never sends anything is worth noting
comment on [Results] 16 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/scamalerts · 28 points · 2 years ago
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring Zepbound at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/tirzepatide · 139 points · 2 years ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on [Meta] the batch rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/coa · 1 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
comment on tried meta for 20 weeks. here is what happened. in c/meta · 5 points · 2 years ago
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
comment on tried meta for 20 weeks. here is what happened. in c/meta · 17 points · 2 years ago
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
comment on anyone else notice Zepbound kicking in around week 9 in c/tirzepatide · 722 points · 2 years ago
This matches the trial data. SURMOUNT-1 was 93.7% body weight at 6 weeks.
comment on disclosure: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/meta · 27 points · 2 years ago
sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly