Quick one. Canada here. purity works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice…
u/anya_correia
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Mysuru.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
Overview — page 2 of 3
comment on related substances is the most under-discussed thing in c/scamalerts in c/coa · 1 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
comment on related substances is the most under-discussed thing in c/scamalerts in c/coa · 55 points · 1 year ago
Sent one vial to PeptideMeter and VendorInvestigate. 93.7% and 98.6%. Cost me more than the vial did and I would do it again.
comment on 22 months in and timeframe is still the thing I get wrong in c/progresspics · 38 points · 1 year ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on milestone: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/progresspics · 2 points · 1 year ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on genuine question about purity that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/coa · 7 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Results] 96 weeks on 5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/coa · 0 points · 1 year ago
Metadata check caught a COA that was created in a browser four months after the analysis date. Not evidence of fraud, but worth flagging to WXT.
comment on [PSA] timeframe is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/progresspics · 12 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on anyone else notice area percent kicking in around week 25 in c/coa · 85 points · 1 year ago
What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.
comment on someone explain progress to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/progresspics · 7 points · 1 year ago
the community is deliberately image-free
comment on area percent — my 20-week log, condensed into one table in c/coa · 1 points · 1 year ago
This is the correct framing. The COA structure matters as much as the number.
comment on area percent — my 20-week log, condensed into one table in c/coa · 72 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 10 weeks, not 29. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on the milestone thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/progresspics · 30 points · 2 years ago
the timeframe change matters as much as the scale
comment on three years of area percent threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coa · 125 points · 2 years ago
Four months on the site and I was confusing area% and mass% in every post I made. One explainer thread and it clicked.
comment on three years of area percent threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coa · 385 points · 2 years ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
comment on three years of area percent threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coa · 0 points · 2 years ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
comment on three years of area percent threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coa · 242 points · 2 years ago
the batch number or it did not happen
Quick one. Canada here. water content works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given…
comment on week 36 check-in — 26kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/progresspics · 48 points · 2 years ago
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify water content in c/coa · -16 points · 2 years ago
redact your own name, not the vendor's batch details