GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Lab] 19th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part — 19 comments in the full submission. View in context.
129
c/survodutide·submitted 6 months ago by u/dario_boateng

[Lab] 19th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part

Trial Databranch of 4 comments

Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/intlshipping repeats that biopsy is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 15 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because…

Read the full submission and all 19 comments →

This branch

4 comments, started 6 months ago
u/marisol_frisk11 points·6 months ago

Strongly agree. The safety story is separate.

replysharereportpermalink
u/hub_opssite staff7 points·6 months ago·edited

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
u/clara_restrepo3 points·6 months ago

the safety profile is not just tirzepatide amplified

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_boatengOP-8 points·6 months ago

Phase 6 or 37?

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/survodutide

Survodutide-specific discussion: glucagon-receptor co-agonism, the hepatic fat and MASH resolution data, and how the side-effect profile compares with GIP-based dual agonism. Small community, high signal.

12kmembers
62submissions
Feb 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/survodutide rules
  1. Glucagon co-agonism has a distinct safety story. Do not generalise from tirzepatide.
  2. MASH claims need the trial and the biopsy endpoint.
  3. Not approved. Descriptive posts only.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.