genuine question about gradient that I am slightly embarrassed to ask
Been lurking in c/t2dglp1 for about 13 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 34, 15mg, and gradient is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 11 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle. What I actually want to know is…
I am going to push back on this slightly.
integration decision on a shoulder changes your number by half a point on its own
area% and mass% are not the same and this whole post conflates them
integration decision on a shoulder changes your number by half a point on its own
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
This is the correct method framing. Column and gradient are load-bearing fields.
This is the correct method framing.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 3 weeks to accept.
Detection wavelength? method development and that changes at different wavelengths.