stalled for 10 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: purity matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 15 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 5 people measuring the same…
integration decision on a shoulder changes your number by half a point on its own
area% and mass% are not the same and this whole post conflates them
area% and mass% are not the same and this whole post conflates them
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
This is the correct method framing. Column and gradient are load-bearing fields.
state the method: column, gradient, detection wavelength, injection volume
Strongly agree. Largest single impurity tells a different story than total purity.
integration decision on a shoulder changes your number by half a point on its own