Skip to content

Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of what changed for me between week 90 and week 44 — 27 comments in the full submission. View in context.

6.8k

c/hplc·submitted 2 years ago by u/ravi_bergstrom

what changed for me between week 90 and week 44

Correctionbranch of 4 comments

Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking LC-MS against ApoB for 9 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here. Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no…

Read the full submission and all 27 comments →

This branch

4 comments, started 2 years ago

u/rina_nascimento311 points·2 years ago

What was the column and what gradient?

replysharereportpermalink

u/saskia_bakker-9 points·2 years ago

area% and mass% are not the same and this whole post conflates them

replysharereportpermalink

u/quiet_reader_991 point·2 years ago

What was the column and what gradient?

replysharereportpermalink

[removed]1 point·2 years ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/hplc

The analytical deep end: RP-HPLC methods, gradient design, integration decisions, LC-MS confirmation, amino-acid analysis, water content, and why two labs can report 98.1% and 96.4% on the same vial and both be right. Post the chromatogram, not the summary line.

32kmembers

130submissions

Sep 2023created

submissions / month, last year

Janoshik Analytical

Independent HPLC and mass spec. The number you get is the number they found.

janoshik.com Sponsored

GL Biochem (Shanghai)

Custom peptides and amino acids direct from the manufacturer since 1998. ISO 9001 / cGMP. Batch COA every order.

More in c/hplc

1[Lab] SGN cagri — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2%14k points · 34 comments
2am I the only one who found method development harder than the injections14k points · 41 comments
3tried HPLC for 5 weeks. here is what happened.13k points · 30 comments
4[Meta] the method development rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining12k points · 17 comments
521 months in and HPLC is still the thing I get wrong8.8k points · 51 comments
6[Question] Ireland — has anyone got a straight answer on chromatogram8.8k points · 34 comments

c/hplc rules

Chromatogram or it did not happen. Axis labels included.
State the method: column, gradient, detection wavelength, injection volume.
Area% is not mass%. Posts that conflate them get a correction flair, not a removal.
Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.

Full rules and how they are enforced →

Moderators

u/sig_figs_sam u/hplc_hobbyist u/peak_area_pete u/mass_spec_maggie

Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.

Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →