UK — my 16-week log, condensed into one table
Genuinely asking, not being difficult.
Everyone in c/dosinglogs repeats that NHS is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 20 threads of people agreeing with each other.
Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true because it has been repeated since 2023?
I am not trying to be the "source?" guy. I would just like a source.
best — the order this archive was captured in
England or Scotland? Different pathways.
MHRA supply notices change monthly, follow the actual list
Strongly agree. pricing is region-specific.
the tier 3 pathway is the only free route, it is slow
This is correct. Private and NHS pathways are different.
This is correct. Private and NHS pathways are different.
This is correct. Private and NHS pathways are different.
The tier 3 pathway in my area: 24 month wait, then 24 months for review, then approved. Total tier 3.
no naming online pharmacies that prescribe without a consultation
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
the Netherlands: 22 month NHS wait, gave up, went private, cost was tier 3 monthly.
MHRA supply notices change monthly, follow the actual list
- 1England or Scotland? Different pathways.6 comments in this branch · started by u/hassan_chowdhury