am I the only one who found reimbursement harder than the injections
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful.
Setup: 15mg, week 43, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — prescription — and tracked it for 9 weeks.
Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am putting it here rather than presenting it as a finding. If two or three other people have done the same thing we might actually learn something.
Not medical advice, obviously. This is one person with a spreadsheet.
best — the order this archive was captured in
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
apotheke, receta, prescription — twenty-seven different answers
Small correction: the trial was 20 weeks, not 20. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
Today's date for the pricing?
EU rules is usually a national question wearing a hat
[removed by moderator]
reimbursement costs in the UK this month
the the Netherlands answer is not the the Netherlands answer
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
Week 96 for me and the honest summary is: 37kg down, early fullness manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Today's date for the pricing?
Not to be pedantic but Apotheke and EMA are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
- 1Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone…5 comments in this branch · started by u/marit_mwangi