u/zeynep_duarte

What are you comparing it against though?

provincial formularies differ sharply

receipts or nothing, sorry but that is the rule

Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.9. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

vendor staff must self-identify, full stop

First order from TFC was great, second one had a different batch and tested lower. The vendor retested and credited me. Logged it here.

REDEFINE readouts are phase 10 data

the periodic argument about wiki standards

special authorisation is province-specific

Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 20–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.

Small correction: the trial was 12 weeks, not 11. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

Which service tested it and what did they come back with?

SSA order #18, Poland, no drama, receipts inside

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

sponsor and disclosure questions are always answered publicly

special authorization is the cross-province difference

Second this question. I have wondered about moderation for 20 months and never seen a straight answer.

CagriSema ratios in trials are fixed, do not extrapolate self-mixing

vendor staff must self-identify, full stop