u/zaid_eriksen
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Beirut.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
Comments — page 2 of 4
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring Janoshik at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 101 points · 4 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring Janoshik at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 238 points · 4 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring Janoshik at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 476 points · 4 months ago
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
comment on France: EU, and what it actually costs here in c/glp1eu · 92 points · 4 months ago
the Ireland answer is not the Ireland answer
comment on 5 months in and Medutest is still the thing I get wrong in c/vendorvetting · 147 points · 5 months ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with order records, not with what you concluded.
comment on is it normal to get nausea at week 84 in c/maintenancephase · 7 points · 5 months ago
dose-stretching experiences welcome, dose-stretching instructions are not
comment on small win: fake COA stopped being a problem at week 55 in c/scamalerts · -2 points · 5 months ago
Batch 11 appeared on QST, Homopeptide, and QST claims it is raw material origin. Could be fine, could be reseller. Logged it in the directory.
comment on small win: fake COA stopped being a problem at week 55 in c/scamalerts · 82 points · 5 months ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is fake COA.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 41 weeks to accept.
comment on small win: fake COA stopped being a problem at week 55 in c/scamalerts · 59 points · 5 months ago
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
comment on am I the only one who found testing harder than the injections in c/vendorvetting · 52 points · 6 months ago
comment on goal weight: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/maintenancephase · 166 points · 6 months ago
the 15mg dose works fine for 3 weeks of the month
comment on [Discussion] reimbursement is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/glp1eu · 7 points · 6 months ago
Strongly agree. Pricing is local.
comment on maintenance vs dose stretching — genuinely asking which matters more in c/maintenancephase · 2 points · 6 months ago
Tried the lowest-effective approach. 1.7mg worked for 13 weeks, then cravings returned. 0.5mg was the actual floor.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring EU at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/glp1eu · 14 points · 7 months ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is reimbursement. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on reading PeptideMeter threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/vendorvetting · -44 points · 7 months ago
Is that a PeptideMeter result or are you quoting the vendor COA?
comment on small win: dose stretching stopped being a problem at week 85 in c/maintenancephase · 16 points · 8 months ago
lowest effective dose is dose stretching, find it or stay higher
comment on three years of prescription threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1eu · 7 points · 8 months ago
Maintenance for 9 months now.
Disagree on that part. 99.0% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on testing — 12 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/vendorvetting · 17 points · 8 months ago
Batch number? Date? Method? Give us the load-bearing fields.
comment on testing — 12 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/vendorvetting · 37 points · 8 months ago
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #19 — Germany, 7 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/maintenancephase · 9 points · 9 months ago
How long at maintenance?