77
[Lab] 14th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part
I have had 2 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe. Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied…
u/yara_mensah
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Catania.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
3,763post karma
4,393comment karma
5submissions
104comments
Overview — page 2 of 5
comment on A1c — my 18-week log, condensed into one table in c/bloodwork · 23 points · 1 months ago
Same lab both times?
comment on reading bloodwork threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/bloodwork · 9 points · 2 months ago
ApoB over LDL-C, that is the hierarchy
comment on [Results] 22 weeks, 15kg, and chargeback was the hard part in c/cryptopay · 34 points · 2 months ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on [Question] DEXA — what am I missing here in c/glp1muscle · 11 points · 2 months ago
resistance training is sarcopenia not optional
comment on stalled for 24 weeks at 1.0mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/cryptopay · 1 points · 2 months ago
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
comment on 18 months in and TRIUMPH is still the thing I get wrong in c/trialwatch · 1 points · 2 months ago
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with SURPASS, not with what you concluded.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for lean mass posts in c/glp1muscle · 3 points · 3 months ago
Yeah, protein matters on rapid loss.
comment on endpoint — my 2-week log, condensed into one table in c/trialwatch · 0 points · 3 months ago
STEP 1 readout: 99.1% mean weight loss, absolute numbers matter. Spread around that mean is enormous.
comment on endpoint — my 2-week log, condensed into one table in c/trialwatch · 26 points · 3 months ago
Phase 2 TRIUMPH looked amazing. Phase 3 trials are harder. Do not anchor on phase 2 readouts.
2.1k
endpoint — my 2-week log, condensed into one table
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/bloodwork repeats that SELECT is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search…
comment on [Vendor] QST order #21 — Canada, 21 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/bloodwork · 42 points · 3 months ago
Yeah, baseline matters more than any later number.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #20 — Germany, 21 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/bloodwork · 159 points · 3 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on my hs-CRP moved and I cannot work out whether network is why in c/cryptopay · 17 points · 4 months ago
stablecoin is USDC, never volatile coins
comment on ApoB: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/bloodwork · 11 points · 4 months ago
Strongly agree. ALT is where you catch the liver story early.
comment on ALT: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/bloodwork · 8 points · 4 months ago
ferritin tanks quietly on a reduced appetite, check it
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on lipids in c/bloodwork · 20 points · 5 months ago
HOMA-IR is crude but free and useful for tracking
comment on USDC: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/cryptopay · 18 points · 5 months ago
Yeah, the network selection matters most.
comment on batch vs test results — genuinely asking which matters more in c/labresults · 19 points · 5 months ago
Slight fix: the number was 99.3, not 93.7. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #6 — the Netherlands, 31 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/trialwatch · 35 points · 6 months ago
Strongly agree. Phase 2 is investigational, not conclusive.