198
[Question] discontinuation — what am I missing here
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: regain matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have…
u/yara_lindholm
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Bergen.
member · joined 14 May 2025
3,617post karma
7,285comment karma
4submissions
34comments
Overview — page 2 of 2
comment on [Question] discontinuation — what am I missing here in c/tapering · 3 points · 8 months ago
Stalled for 19 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 62.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 28 weeks to accept.
comment on [Question] discontinuation — what am I missing here in c/tapering · 12 points · 8 months ago
Week 38 for me and the honest summary is: 4kg down, muscle cramps manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
comment on is it normal to get fatigue at week 90 in c/retatrutide · 257 points · 9 months ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on is it normal to get nausea at week 65 in c/retatrutide · 295 points · 11 months ago
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder
comment on help me understand progress, I have read the wiki twice in c/progresspics · 86 points · 1 year ago
Stalled for 18 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 83.
comment on tried interval stretching for 3 weeks. here is what happened. in c/tapering · 11 points · 1 year ago
tapering instructions are not welcome here
comment on 22 months in and milestone is still the thing I get wrong in c/progresspics · 38 points · 1 year ago
Did anything else change in the same window?
comment on [Question] New Zealand — has anyone got a straight answer on dose escalation in c/retatrutide · 40 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
comment on tried interval stretching for 17 weeks. here is what happened. in c/tapering · 6 points · 1 year ago
The early fullness was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
660
tried interval stretching for 17 weeks. here is what happened.
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: interval stretching matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error.…
comment on goal — my 13-week log, condensed into one table in c/progresspics · 18 points · 2 years ago
the community is deliberately image-free
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 15 in c/retatrutide · 97 points · 2 years ago
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
comment on week 56 check-in — 46kg down, early fullness manageable, one thing confusing me in c/retatrutide · 75 points · 2 years ago
research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols
comment on [Discussion] the glucagon advice in here is 17 years out of date in c/retatrutide · 32 points · 2 years ago
triple agonism plus glucagon is a different physiological state than GIP/GLP-1 dual
comment on 12 months in and triple agonist is still the thing I get wrong in c/retatrutide · 1.2k points · 2 years ago
Half-life is about 168 hours, so steady state lands around week 16–5. Practical consequence: what you feel in week 1 is not what that dose does.
comment on switched from 5mg to 2.5mg and the constipation got better, not worse in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 2 years ago
Did you actually measure heart rate or is that a feeling?
comment on [Results] 2 weeks, 46kg, and phase 2 was the hard part in c/retatrutide · 2.9k points · 2 years ago
i have this exact spreadsheet